Welcome to the JaguarPC Community
JaguarPC
Sales: (888) 338-5261
Support: (888)-551-3050
Results 1 to 8 of 8

This is a discussion on Nuclear submarines to battle terrorism in the Open Discussion & Chit-chat forum
I came across this in another forum. Thought the article was interesting whether true or not. Click for article ...

  1. #1
    Old Hillbilly Connie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Hills of Missouri
    Posts
    2,646

    Nuclear submarines to battle terrorism

    I came across this in another forum. Thought the article was interesting whether true or not.


    Click for article


    Forum Moderators - Jag Staff

    Spam Whackers Blog - Dedicated to fighting Spam and providing General SEO Tips
    Organize your Kitchen or purchase Kitchen Accessories at Condells
    Ihelpyou Forum - Dedicated to "Best Practices" SEO

  2. #2
    Jag Veteran
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Location: Location:
    Posts
    633
    odd... A sub built around the designs they lay out would have pretty good displacement. I wonder how 'shallow' they mean? Anyone have insight into these kinds of boats?

  3. #3
    v1.3 upgrade
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Texas...where else?
    Posts
    389
    http://www.janes.com/defence/naval_f...1025_1_n.shtml

    A better design for an old concept. But these articles don't begin to scratch the surface (pun intended).

  4. #4
    Jag Veteran
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Location: Location:
    Posts
    633
    interesting. I should renew my Jane's subscription!

    Any idea if the lockout is meant for surface or subsurface deployment? I'd heard rumors of a flood room for 30m launch, but I have no real idea. I'm not sure if you could convince me that's a good idea, anyway

  5. #5
    v1.3 upgrade
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Texas...where else?
    Posts
    389
    The only reason I can see for needing surface deployment would be if the equipment was too large for submerged deployment....possible but highly unlikely.

    And 30m is rather shallow.

  6. #6
    Jag Veteran
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Location: Location:
    Posts
    633
    30m *is* shallow for equipment, but not for minimally equiped personnel. I'm thinking rebreathers at the least - huffing a 40lb+ pack up to the surface in the dark would be a challenge. I know there is training for that, and freediving goes quite a bit deeper, but it's still risky for the soldiers.

  7. #7
    v1.3 upgrade
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Texas...where else?
    Posts
    389
    Positive bouyancy eliminates the need for huffing and there really is minimal effort required to move stuff (relatively speaking). The toughest challenge is usually the cold. At 30 meters you have about 25 mins. at depth with standard scuba gear before there is a need to take decompression breaks on the way to the surface. You can exit, assemble and be on the surface in that amount of time...just a walk in the park.

  8. #8
    Jag Veteran
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Location: Location:
    Posts
    633
    I realize bouyancy helps out, but I was under the impression most of the load was designed to be neutral or similar to the human body - I really don't know. And I also didn't know you had 25 min before decompression was needed. I thought it was less in colder water because of the lack of diffusion. Again, I have no real idea

    But, I'll take your word for it, never having done anything more than snorkeling myself!

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •