Nobody cares about Karl Rove's conversation with columnist Robert Novak...
This is a discussion on Dear Commies in the Open Discussion & Chit-chat forum
Nobody cares about Karl Rove's conversation with columnist Robert Novak... ...
Nobody cares about Karl Rove's conversation with columnist Robert Novak...
DISCLAIMER Any resemblance between the views expressed above and those of the owners and operators of this system is purely coincidental. Any resemblance between these views and my own are non-deterministic. The existence of Vin DSL is questionable. The existence of views in the absence of anyone to hold them is problematic. The existence of the reader is left as an exercise in the second-order coefficient.
Freedom of speech? They should all be charged with treason.
My favorite headline in The Onion (http://www.theonion.com) lately has been:
Bush Awaits Orders From Rove On Handling Of Rove Scandal
...edited for spelling...
Last edited by JonathanB; 07-26-2005 at 07:30 PM.
Oh and I almost forgot... ya gotta love how honor and dignity has been restored to the White House...
Um... nobody cares about Peter Jennings dieing either...
DISCLAIMER Any resemblance between the views expressed above and those of the owners and operators of this system is purely coincidental. Any resemblance between these views and my own are non-deterministic. The existence of Vin DSL is questionable. The existence of views in the absence of anyone to hold them is problematic. The existence of the reader is left as an exercise in the second-order coefficient.
Vin, you are an odd fellow...
The tabloids were right. I'm shocked.
Actually, I'm saddened by Jennings' death. didn't always like him, but respected his career and his fight.
Not bad for a high school drop out! He was Canadian, almost to the end, but died an American liberal. Wonder which way he's going?Originally Posted by lokki
![]()
DISCLAIMER Any resemblance between the views expressed above and those of the owners and operators of this system is purely coincidental. Any resemblance between these views and my own are non-deterministic. The existence of Vin DSL is questionable. The existence of views in the absence of anyone to hold them is problematic. The existence of the reader is left as an exercise in the second-order coefficient.
What do you mean? Like still voting for the next Democratic candidate? I hear that's how lots of people voted for Al Gore...Originally Posted by Vin DSL
![]()
![]()
Nobody cares about 'Atilla The Honey' sacking Crawford either!
DISCLAIMER Any resemblance between the views expressed above and those of the owners and operators of this system is purely coincidental. Any resemblance between these views and my own are non-deterministic. The existence of Vin DSL is questionable. The existence of views in the absence of anyone to hold them is problematic. The existence of the reader is left as an exercise in the second-order coefficient.
Oh, gosh, I hit a nerve...
Where are all you bleeding liberals, lambasting me for attacking a 'grieving mom'? The fact of the matter is, even Commies can smell a rat...
My liberal union cohorts tell me, 'they' (the Dems) are waiting to see if this broad is for real. Heh! 'They' know...
'Atilla the Honey' is NOT a grieving mom! She's a controlling bish that used her son for her own agenda. He finally had enough, and went to Iraq to get away from her. A short time later, he was dead, and she's pissed at him, and George Bush, for taking away her forum. To her credit, she's still using her son, in the grave, to advance her cause.
EDIT: Bingo!SOURCE: A REAL Commie ragAs WorldNetDaily previously reported, members of Sheehan's own family are blasting Cindy's efforts, claiming she's trying to promote her personal agenda "at the expense of her son's good name and reputation."
Last edited by Vin DSL; 08-16-2005 at 02:17 AM.
DISCLAIMER Any resemblance between the views expressed above and those of the owners and operators of this system is purely coincidental. Any resemblance between these views and my own are non-deterministic. The existence of Vin DSL is questionable. The existence of views in the absence of anyone to hold them is problematic. The existence of the reader is left as an exercise in the second-order coefficient.
The blogosphere figured this out quite a few days ago, Vin. This is now old news. Of course, you won't find the whole story in the over-air MSM for some time.
I didn't know that. I naturally ignore protesters anyway, so I have pretty much ignored this whole thing. (I did like the article about the neighbor shooting into the air though)
[edit]
That's an interesting article. I hope she realizes that her taxes paid her son's wages, and any benefits she currently gets from the government (like the right to protest...)
I hope the IRS goes after her with guns blazing. (They were the ones who took Capone down, I'm sure they can get this woman straightened up...)
I am confused, maybe you all can help me figure this out...
Bush says we must "stay the course" until Iraq can defend itself against insurgents etc..
We have 128K troops in Iraq and have trained 2K Iraqis for a total of 130K troops and cannot control 'any' city in Iraq. If we train an additional 10K Iraqis and manage to secure Iraq (hey, it's possible...) does that mean we would have to train a total of 140K Iraqis before pulling out
of Iraq completely?
(Let's see 138K/2K/year = 69 years...maybe there is a compounding interest formula that can be applied here...hmm)
Any mathematicians who can answer this for me?
Copyright © 2011 JaguarPC.com
Bookmarks