$6 billion a year to haul trash from the International Space Station...
Orbiting Trash Truck: http://www.nasa.gov/returntoflight/main/index.html
I don't get it!
This is a discussion on Can Anybody Explain Why We're In The Trash Hauling Business?!?!? in the Open Discussion & Chit-chat forum
$6 billion a year to haul trash from the International Space Station...
Orbiting Trash Truck: http://www.nasa.gov/returntoflight/main/index.html
I don't get it! ...
$6 billion a year to haul trash from the International Space Station...
Orbiting Trash Truck: http://www.nasa.gov/returntoflight/main/index.html
I don't get it!
DISCLAIMER Any resemblance between the views expressed above and those of the owners and operators of this system is purely coincidental. Any resemblance between these views and my own are non-deterministic. The existence of Vin DSL is questionable. The existence of views in the absence of anyone to hold them is problematic. The existence of the reader is left as an exercise in the second-order coefficient.
Here's the dumpster: http://www.nasa.gov/vision/space/wor...lm_module.html
DISCLAIMER Any resemblance between the views expressed above and those of the owners and operators of this system is purely coincidental. Any resemblance between these views and my own are non-deterministic. The existence of Vin DSL is questionable. The existence of views in the absence of anyone to hold them is problematic. The existence of the reader is left as an exercise in the second-order coefficient.
We do it because we're the only ones who can--because we're the only ones smart [stupid?] enough to build a shuttle.
it would be relatively cheap to send up some metal drums with 1-minute chemical motors attached, and send the waste to the sun. Just have to figure trajectory and timing which could be calculated relatively easily once the first one is done.
Sure, the barrels would never get there in our lifetimes, but as long as they are vaguely accurately placed, who cares? They wouldn't do anything but burn up. For that matter, the waste could be put fired at the atmosphere in low angle descent for the same effect.
That would be cool... shooting stars--of trash![]()
It's likely the same mentality that determine what happened upon discovering a standard pen would not work in a zero g environment.
The US spent a million dollars redesigning the pen so it would write in a weightless environment.
The Russians used a #2 pencil.
Edward Rands
So 'they' say.Originally Posted by Percipient
![]()
There's no doubt that NASA has spent billions of dollars, chasing chimeras, but that particular one is supposedly false...
http://www.snopes.com/business/genius/spacepen.asp
I wonder how much they've spent on other 'crap'?
http://www.nasa.gov/vision/earth/tec..._wastenot.html
DISCLAIMER Any resemblance between the views expressed above and those of the owners and operators of this system is purely coincidental. Any resemblance between these views and my own are non-deterministic. The existence of Vin DSL is questionable. The existence of views in the absence of anyone to hold them is problematic. The existence of the reader is left as an exercise in the second-order coefficient.
That's nothing, Vin. My management has been powered by pure **** for years.
Copyright © 2011 JaguarPC.com
Bookmarks