Welcome to the JaguarPC Community
JaguarPC
Sales: (888) 338-5261
Support: (888)-551-3050
Results 1 to 7 of 7

This is a discussion on Yet Again, Vin DSL is slightly ahead of the curve in the Open Discussion & Chit-chat forum
Good thing you didn't visit the domain too often, Vin. Attendees [at an ICANN meeting] will also discuss a recent site-registration practice called "kiting" and ...

  1. #1
    Ron
    Ron is offline
    Loyal Client
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    7,304

    Yet Again, Vin DSL is slightly ahead of the curve

    Good thing you didn't visit the domain too often, Vin.

    Attendees [at an ICANN meeting] will also discuss a recent site-registration practice called "kiting" and "tasting" that is generating much controversy. It involves the wholesale purchase of expired domain names, and the subsequent cancellation of most of them during a five-day "grace" period allowed as part of the process. If cancelled before the five days are up, the registration fee is fully refunded. Those who engage in this practice only keep the domain names that attract enough traffic to justify their registration fee, and proceed to "park" those sites and load them with pay-per-click ads.

    "There's a whole discussion going on in the community about whether there should be anything done about this," Twomey said. "There are people who think this isn't an appropriate behaviour. Others think this is just the market at work."

    Those opposed to "kiting" are suggesting that ICANN impose some sort of fee whenever a registration is cancelled before the grace period is over, a move they feel will discourage the practice.
    Source: http://www.macworld.co.uk/news/index...S&newsID=16654

  2. #2
    Loyal Client Pawel Kowalski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Albuquerque NM
    Posts
    1,405
    As much as I hate these sites the fact is if done right they can generate quite a bit of money.

  3. #3
    Loyal Client the_ancient's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    3,386
    ofcourse as per usual ICANN's reponse to a to a problem is just as bad or worse than the problems itself..

    Sometimes I wonder if the Feds dont directly run ICANN, ICANN and the feds have the same mantra,

    "Make everything as complex as possible why extorting, fining, and taxing the populace to death."
    -------------------------
    the_ancient
    MP Technology Group

  4. #4
    Old Hillbilly Connie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Hills of Missouri
    Posts
    2,646
    Yet Again, Vin DSL is slightly ahead of the curve
    Don't contribute to Vins Big Head.

    Forum Moderators - Jag Staff

    Spam Whackers Blog - Dedicated to fighting Spam and providing General SEO Tips
    Organize your Kitchen or purchase Kitchen Accessories at Condells
    Ihelpyou Forum - Dedicated to "Best Practices" SEO

  5. #5
    Ron
    Ron is offline
    Loyal Client
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    7,304
    Yeah, I have a suggestion: Don't allow cancellations. Or better yet - allow cancellations but no refunds at all.

    We're talking about what, a $0.25 ICANN fee anyway, right?
    Good luck

  6. #6
    JPC Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    70
    Yeah there should be a portion of the fee that is non-refundable, ie you should only get 75% refund or someting like that... with maybe a full refund only within 24 hours of registering the domain (i know I have put in the wrong domain name before)...
    Last edited by lobos; 12-07-2006 at 06:23 AM.

  7. #7
    Ron
    Ron is offline
    Loyal Client
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    7,304
    Thing is it's a quarter. Your registrar might not allow you to cancel. I don't think that eNom allows you to. If they did, right now you could get all of your money back. Under my suggestion that the ICANN fee be non-refundable, you'd have to forfeit 25 cents or maybe 50 cetns or whatever your registrar feels is "fair enough".

    These people doing this are registrars themselves and they are registering thousand of names at a time and then cancelling them.

    What's a quarter to you for your typo? Nothing. For them, that quarter really adds up when you multiply it by tens of thousands. Therefore that quarter could actually dissuade them from doing this, and filling the internet with (more) bogus spam sites.

    Just my opinion.
    Good luck

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •