Yep, it's that time again...![]()
http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox.../releasenotes/
Went without a hitch!
This is a discussion on Firefox 2.0.0.4 Released 30 May 2007 in the Open Discussion & Chit-chat forum
Yep, it's that time again...
http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox.../releasenotes/
Went without a hitch! ...
Yep, it's that time again...![]()
http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox.../releasenotes/
Went without a hitch!
DISCLAIMER Any resemblance between the views expressed above and those of the owners and operators of this system is purely coincidental. Any resemblance between these views and my own are non-deterministic. The existence of Vin DSL is questionable. The existence of views in the absence of anyone to hold them is problematic. The existence of the reader is left as an exercise in the second-order coefficient.
isn't everyone using automatic update these days?
my browser just restarted lastnight and I had updated.
All opinions are the result of being uninformed, unintelligent and uninterested!
To each his own...![]()
I don't play by the normal rules!
In my case, I don't install Firefox on computer[s], at least not in a catholic sense.
I run Portable Firefox and carry it around in my pocket!
I run Portable Firefox on a virtual drive, encrypted with AES-Twofish-Serpent via TrueCrypt.
I also turn off anything and everything that communicates with Mozilla & Google in the background.
I *imagine* some other thinking ppl are doing the same!
So, the answer is, no...![]()
DISCLAIMER Any resemblance between the views expressed above and those of the owners and operators of this system is purely coincidental. Any resemblance between these views and my own are non-deterministic. The existence of Vin DSL is questionable. The existence of views in the absence of anyone to hold them is problematic. The existence of the reader is left as an exercise in the second-order coefficient.
Yes, 'thinking' ppl...
After all, isn't that the whole purpose of automatic updating, as in...
"Duh! I'm too lazy and stupid to do it myself?"
DISCLAIMER Any resemblance between the views expressed above and those of the owners and operators of this system is purely coincidental. Any resemblance between these views and my own are non-deterministic. The existence of Vin DSL is questionable. The existence of views in the absence of anyone to hold them is problematic. The existence of the reader is left as an exercise in the second-order coefficient.
Maybe Vin should have said... "Other people who aren't paranoid."
Perhaps I'm naive, but I look at the Mozilla products as fairly safe for automatic upgrades. I have both Firefox and Thunderbird set to do that on my system. They are about the only programs I allow to auto-upgrade however.
DISCLAIMER Any resemblance between the views expressed above and those of the owners and operators of this system is purely coincidental. Any resemblance between these views and my own are non-deterministic. The existence of Vin DSL is questionable. The existence of views in the absence of anyone to hold them is problematic. The existence of the reader is left as an exercise in the second-order coefficient.
yeah, done that a thousand times and no, there isn't.
I don't need to be paranoid or rude to keep my computer secure and safe.
All opinions are the result of being uninformed, unintelligent and uninterested!
Um...
- A little paranoia is a good thing!
- Sorry if I *sounded* rude.
Perhaps, "other like-minded ppl"' would have *sounded* better than "other thinking ppl"...
Personally, I don't like programs 'phoning home' in the background. By default, Firefox sends YOUR info to Mozilla and Google, et al -- and you can take that to the bank!!!
Ask Spath about this! He's the one that clued me in, and upon investigation, he was right...
Good reading: Google making more inroads into privacy?
DISCLAIMER Any resemblance between the views expressed above and those of the owners and operators of this system is purely coincidental. Any resemblance between these views and my own are non-deterministic. The existence of Vin DSL is questionable. The existence of views in the absence of anyone to hold them is problematic. The existence of the reader is left as an exercise in the second-order coefficient.
Thanks for pointing out Spath's post about that. I completely missed it when it was originally posted.
Now turned OFF in my browser. I believe I'm savy enough not to fall for any of those phishing sites and their scams anyway.
never used the phishing things ma self.
you gotta be pretty new to the internet or hiding under a rock to not know about them and take extra care with important sites like banking, ebay, paypal and so forth.
All opinions are the result of being uninformed, unintelligent and uninterested!
Yeah, okay, whatever!
I believe both of you...
Even though neither one of you would have given ME the benefit of the doubt two posts ago...
Remember this in the fiuture!
DISCLAIMER Any resemblance between the views expressed above and those of the owners and operators of this system is purely coincidental. Any resemblance between these views and my own are non-deterministic. The existence of Vin DSL is questionable. The existence of views in the absence of anyone to hold them is problematic. The existence of the reader is left as an exercise in the second-order coefficient.
heh, I turned it off cause I don't like my browser telling me stuff I already know.
plus I don't think I've ever actually been to a phishy site..
All opinions are the result of being uninformed, unintelligent and uninterested!
Copyright © 2011 JaguarPC.com
Bookmarks