Is Puma better now?

[JBult]

This morning I checked my site. It came up nice and fast. I checked http://puma.nocdns.com and the loads were the same as they have been for the past couple weeks (3.21 3.21 3.12). Is Puma cured of it's problems?

[jkeller]

I'd like to hope so, but I don't know; "/usr" is at 92%, which might not be a positive sign. The only people who could say for sure are the support people and those user who have received a reply on their tickets.

[lookout]

Better for the moment it seems, at least in terms of response times, which for me is the most important.

For the record, the reporting statistics appear disabled, I don't know what else. Still monitoring.....

[LeeUmm]

It has been better yes, but who knows how long it'll last. Hopefully it'll last till the switch is made.

[JBult]

I have noticed that when I initially try to go to the page that there is a slight delay and then it kicks off and goes real fast. I'm not sure what that's all about.

Hmmm... Now that I test it again, it's not doing it anymore. It's still very fast and the load times are 6.29 4.79 4.45.