Welcome to the JaguarPC Community
JaguarPC
Sales: (888) 338-5261
Support: (888)-551-3050
Results 1 to 13 of 13

This is a discussion on bizarre "Latest Users" logs... in the Shared & Semi-Dedicated forum
I found a strange set of entries spanning 4 days in my "Latest Users" logs... the entries consist of huge strings in the URL identifier, ...

  1. #1
    Jag Veteran
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Location: Location:
    Posts
    633

    bizarre "Latest Users" logs...

    I found a strange set of entries spanning 4 days in my "Latest Users" logs... the entries consist of huge strings in the URL identifier, but the strings don't appear to be valid URLs.

    They are of the format "\x90" for several hundred/thousand repeats, then "\xb1\x02" for another few thousand... The sequences literally fill 2-3 scrolled screens, and the refering hosts are all different IPs.

    Further, the http code is 353, but I haven't found a reference that defines this.

    All other fields are null or blank... In total, there are I think 7 records that look like this, and the rest are normal, including some bogus CGI hits.

    Any ideas? I've saved the HTML file if anyone would like to look at it.

    Thanks!

  2. #2
    Community Leader jason's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Posts
    6,003
    It looks like someone trying to exploid an old MS vulnerability byt trying to force a buffer overflow. I wouldn't worry about it, though, since most of those types of attacks are targeted at Windows servers and have no effect here.

    --Jason
    Jason Pitoniak
    Interbrite Communications
    www.interbrite.com www.kodiakskorner.com

  3. #3
    Jag Veteran
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Location: Location:
    Posts
    633
    I ran the IPs and came up with Russia, China, Hungary, etc...

    Glad I went with *nix hosting!

    Thanks for the info, jason

  4. #4
    Squeegy Boy TeeJay's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Nueva Ecija
    Posts
    147
    I know I am safe but I'm getting a lot of 'em today. very very annoying

  5. #5
    JPC Member
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    9

    Thumbs up You can try it...

    Hi,

    You can try it by adding ::

    SetEnvIfNoCase Request_URI "^/\x90/" dontlog

    In your .htaccess file and i hope it will works

  6. #6
    Old Hillbilly Connie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Hills of Missouri
    Posts
    2,648
    Originally posted by TeeJay
    I know I am safe but I'm getting a lot of 'em today. very very annoying
    Not much you can do about it. Be glad your safe.


    Forum Moderators - Jag Staff

    Spam Whackers Blog - Dedicated to fighting Spam and providing General SEO Tips
    Organize your Kitchen or purchase Kitchen Accessories at Condells
    Ihelpyou Forum - Dedicated to "Best Practices" SEO

  7. #7
    Loyal Client
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Wisconsin, USA
    Posts
    568
    I can sympathize. I just downloaded my logs for April today and found a ton of those also.

    What was annoying was when I tried to look through the logs in my text viewer with word wrap on.

    Like the others said, at least we know we're safe from those attacks.

  8. #8
    JPC Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    6

    Lightbulb

    Last edited by d4rk; 05-04-2004 at 05:46 PM.

  9. #9
    JPC Member
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    9

    Lightbulb Hi EveryOne..

    Hi,

    You can add the following rules in your .htaccess file to prevent shell code logs ::

    SetEnvIf Request_URI "GET" Log
    SetEnvIf Request_URI "POST" Log
    CustomLog /var/apache/logs/access_log common env=Log

    This will log only your GET and POST http request (the shell code starts using the SEARCH request so it will not logged in your raw logs)

    And if you are using your own dedicated server you can protect your servers using "iptables" ::

    iptables -I INPUT -j DROP -p tcp -s 0.0.0.0/0 --dport 80 -m string --string "SEARCH"

    "All the Best"

  10. #10
    Jag Veteran
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Location: Location:
    Posts
    633
    Thanks for that, Brian!

  11. #11
    Ron
    Guest
    I really don't want to be the canary on this one.... will someone let us know if this approach works in reducing/eliminating those darn search entries, and if everything else gets properly logged?

    Thanks

  12. #12
    Yeah, I know a LOT! Vin DSL's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Arizona Uplands
    Posts
    10,775

    Re: Hi EveryOne..

    Originally posted by Jpc-Brian
    Hi,

    You can add the following rules in your .htaccess file to prevent shell code logs ::

    SetEnvIf Request_URI "GET" Log
    SetEnvIf Request_URI "POST" Log
    CustomLog /var/apache/logs/access_log common env=Log

    Um... wouldn't you have to put those in the server conf?
    DISCLAIMER Any resemblance between the views expressed above and those of the owners and operators of this system is purely coincidental. Any resemblance between these views and my own are non-deterministic. The existence of Vin DSL is questionable. The existence of views in the absence of anyone to hold them is problematic. The existence of the reader is left as an exercise in the second-order coefficient.

    No Guts, No Story! VinDSL © 2010

  13. #13
    Yeah, I know a LOT! Vin DSL's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Arizona Uplands
    Posts
    10,775
    Originally posted by Ron
    I really don't want to be the canary on this one.... will someone let us know if this approach works in reducing/eliminating those darn search entries, and if everything else gets properly logged?

    Thanks
    As far as I know, this is a bug in Apache which has never been addressed. 'Search' entries cannot be eliminated from the logs, no matter what you do. If you figure out a workaround, you will be world famous.
    DISCLAIMER Any resemblance between the views expressed above and those of the owners and operators of this system is purely coincidental. Any resemblance between these views and my own are non-deterministic. The existence of Vin DSL is questionable. The existence of views in the absence of anyone to hold them is problematic. The existence of the reader is left as an exercise in the second-order coefficient.

    No Guts, No Story! VinDSL © 2010

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •