Welcome to the JaguarPC Community
JaguarPC
Sales: (888) 338-5261
Support: (888)-551-3050
Results 1 to 3 of 3

This is a discussion on Gotta Love That Level 3 in the Shared & Semi-Dedicated forum
Code: Microsoft Windows 2000 [Version 5.00.2195] (C) Copyright 1985-2000 Microsoft Corp. C:\>tracert lenon.com Tracing route to lenon.com [69.73.166.75] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 ...

  1. 07-23-2006, 06:48 PM #1
    Vin DSL
    Vin DSL is offline
    Yeah, I know a LOT! Vin DSL's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Arizona Uplands
    Posts
    10,775

    Unhappy Gotta Love That Level 3

    Code:
    Microsoft Windows 2000 [Version 5.00.2195]
(C) Copyright 1985-2000 Microsoft Corp.

C:\>tracert lenon.com

Tracing route to lenon.com [69.73.166.75]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

  1     1 ms     1 ms     1 ms  10.0.0.1
  2    45 ms    43 ms    44 ms  lo0-ar1.phx.cybertrails.com [xxx.xx.xxx.x]
  3    45 ms    53 ms    44 ms  ge-7-0.1000M.gsr1.phx.cybertrails.com [xxx.xx.xxx.xxx]
  4    46 ms    45 ms    45 ms  phv-edge-02.inet.qwest.net [72.164.12.9]
  5    45 ms    45 ms    46 ms  phx-core-01.inet.qwest.net [205.171.129.113]
  6    64 ms    65 ms    64 ms  svx-core-02.inet.qwest.net [67.14.1.58]
  7    65 ms    64 ms    63 ms  sjp-brdr-01.inet.qwest.net [205.171.214.138]
  8    65 ms    64 ms    65 ms  so-2-0-0.edge1.SanJose1.Level3.net [209.245.146.229]
  9    64 ms    64 ms    69 ms  so-1-2-0.bbr2.SanJose1.Level3.net [209.244.3.141]

 Hello?!?!

 10    95 ms   122 ms    95 ms  so-1-0-0.mp1.Houston1.Level3.net [209.247.11.169]
 11    95 ms    96 ms    95 ms  so-10-0.hsa2.Houston1.Level3.net [4.68.112.150]
 12    96 ms    95 ms    95 ms  unknown.Level3.net [209.247.109.114]
 13    93 ms    91 ms    96 ms  hou-rtr3-vl2.cyrusone.com [69.7.175.19]
 14    93 ms    95 ms    98 ms  vl2-rtr1.nocdirect.com [69.7.160.227]
 15    93 ms    93 ms    94 ms  69.73.166.75

Trace complete.

C:\>
    DISCLAIMER Any resemblance between the views expressed above and those of the owners and operators of this system is purely coincidental. Any resemblance between these views and my own are non-deterministic. The existence of Vin DSL is questionable. The existence of views in the absence of anyone to hold them is problematic. The existence of the reader is left as an exercise in the second-order coefficient.

    No Guts, No Story! VinDSL © 2010
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 07-23-2006, 06:54 PM #2
    Vin DSL
    Vin DSL is offline
    Yeah, I know a LOT! Vin DSL's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Arizona Uplands
    Posts
    10,775
    Code:
    Microsoft Windows 2000 [Version 5.00.2195]
(C) Copyright 1985-2000 Microsoft Corp.

C:\>ping lenon.com -n 100

Pinging lenon.com [69.73.166.75] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 69.73.166.75: bytes=32 time=102ms TTL=54
Reply from 69.73.166.75: bytes=32 time=93ms TTL=54
Reply from 69.73.166.75: bytes=32 time=91ms TTL=54
Reply from 69.73.166.75: bytes=32 time=92ms TTL=54
Reply from 69.73.166.75: bytes=32 time=92ms TTL=54
Reply from 69.73.166.75: bytes=32 time=92ms TTL=54
Reply from 69.73.166.75: bytes=32 time=92ms TTL=54
Reply from 69.73.166.75: bytes=32 time=92ms TTL=54
Reply from 69.73.166.75: bytes=32 time=91ms TTL=54
Reply from 69.73.166.75: bytes=32 time=92ms TTL=54
Reply from 69.73.166.75: bytes=32 time=91ms TTL=54
Reply from 69.73.166.75: bytes=32 time=92ms TTL=54
Reply from 69.73.166.75: bytes=32 time=92ms TTL=54
Reply from 69.73.166.75: bytes=32 time=92ms TTL=54
Reply from 69.73.166.75: bytes=32 time=91ms TTL=54
Reply from 69.73.166.75: bytes=32 time=93ms TTL=54
Reply from 69.73.166.75: bytes=32 time=93ms TTL=54
Reply from 69.73.166.75: bytes=32 time=91ms TTL=54
Reply from 69.73.166.75: bytes=32 time=98ms TTL=54
Request timed out.
Reply from 69.73.166.75: bytes=32 time=92ms TTL=54
Reply from 69.73.166.75: bytes=32 time=92ms TTL=54
Reply from 69.73.166.75: bytes=32 time=104ms TTL=54
Reply from 69.73.166.75: bytes=32 time=100ms TTL=54
Reply from 69.73.166.75: bytes=32 time=105ms TTL=54
Reply from 69.73.166.75: bytes=32 time=94ms TTL=54
Reply from 69.73.166.75: bytes=32 time=92ms TTL=54
Reply from 69.73.166.75: bytes=32 time=92ms TTL=54
Reply from 69.73.166.75: bytes=32 time=93ms TTL=54
Reply from 69.73.166.75: bytes=32 time=92ms TTL=54
Reply from 69.73.166.75: bytes=32 time=98ms TTL=54
Reply from 69.73.166.75: bytes=32 time=95ms TTL=54
Reply from 69.73.166.75: bytes=32 time=93ms TTL=54
Reply from 69.73.166.75: bytes=32 time=92ms TTL=54
Request timed out.
Reply from 69.73.166.75: bytes=32 time=91ms TTL=54
Reply from 69.73.166.75: bytes=32 time=92ms TTL=54
Reply from 69.73.166.75: bytes=32 time=105ms TTL=54
Reply from 69.73.166.75: bytes=32 time=102ms TTL=54
Reply from 69.73.166.75: bytes=32 time=95ms TTL=54
Reply from 69.73.166.75: bytes=32 time=93ms TTL=54
Reply from 69.73.166.75: bytes=32 time=100ms TTL=54
Reply from 69.73.166.75: bytes=32 time=99ms TTL=54
Reply from 69.73.166.75: bytes=32 time=92ms TTL=54
Reply from 69.73.166.75: bytes=32 time=92ms TTL=54
Reply from 69.73.166.75: bytes=32 time=92ms TTL=54
Reply from 69.73.166.75: bytes=32 time=92ms TTL=54
Reply from 69.73.166.75: bytes=32 time=92ms TTL=54
Reply from 69.73.166.75: bytes=32 time=92ms TTL=54
Reply from 69.73.166.75: bytes=32 time=92ms TTL=54
Reply from 69.73.166.75: bytes=32 time=96ms TTL=54
Reply from 69.73.166.75: bytes=32 time=93ms TTL=54
Reply from 69.73.166.75: bytes=32 time=93ms TTL=54
Reply from 69.73.166.75: bytes=32 time=92ms TTL=54
Reply from 69.73.166.75: bytes=32 time=93ms TTL=54
Reply from 69.73.166.75: bytes=32 time=93ms TTL=54
Reply from 69.73.166.75: bytes=32 time=91ms TTL=54
Reply from 69.73.166.75: bytes=32 time=93ms TTL=54
Reply from 69.73.166.75: bytes=32 time=91ms TTL=54
Reply from 69.73.166.75: bytes=32 time=93ms TTL=54
Reply from 69.73.166.75: bytes=32 time=92ms TTL=54
Reply from 69.73.166.75: bytes=32 time=93ms TTL=54
Reply from 69.73.166.75: bytes=32 time=95ms TTL=54
Reply from 69.73.166.75: bytes=32 time=92ms TTL=54
Reply from 69.73.166.75: bytes=32 time=93ms TTL=54
Reply from 69.73.166.75: bytes=32 time=92ms TTL=54
Reply from 69.73.166.75: bytes=32 time=92ms TTL=54
Reply from 69.73.166.75: bytes=32 time=92ms TTL=54
Reply from 69.73.166.75: bytes=32 time=92ms TTL=54
Reply from 69.73.166.75: bytes=32 time=93ms TTL=54
Reply from 69.73.166.75: bytes=32 time=92ms TTL=54
Reply from 69.73.166.75: bytes=32 time=93ms TTL=54
Reply from 69.73.166.75: bytes=32 time=91ms TTL=54
Reply from 69.73.166.75: bytes=32 time=92ms TTL=54
Reply from 69.73.166.75: bytes=32 time=94ms TTL=54
Reply from 69.73.166.75: bytes=32 time=91ms TTL=54
Reply from 69.73.166.75: bytes=32 time=92ms TTL=54
Reply from 69.73.166.75: bytes=32 time=92ms TTL=54
Reply from 69.73.166.75: bytes=32 time=93ms TTL=54
Reply from 69.73.166.75: bytes=32 time=93ms TTL=54
Reply from 69.73.166.75: bytes=32 time=91ms TTL=54
Reply from 69.73.166.75: bytes=32 time=92ms TTL=54
Reply from 69.73.166.75: bytes=32 time=94ms TTL=54
Request timed out.
Reply from 69.73.166.75: bytes=32 time=100ms TTL=54
Reply from 69.73.166.75: bytes=32 time=92ms TTL=54
Reply from 69.73.166.75: bytes=32 time=94ms TTL=54
Reply from 69.73.166.75: bytes=32 time=93ms TTL=54
Reply from 69.73.166.75: bytes=32 time=95ms TTL=54
Reply from 69.73.166.75: bytes=32 time=93ms TTL=54
Reply from 69.73.166.75: bytes=32 time=91ms TTL=54
Reply from 69.73.166.75: bytes=32 time=92ms TTL=54
Reply from 69.73.166.75: bytes=32 time=93ms TTL=54
Reply from 69.73.166.75: bytes=32 time=92ms TTL=54
Reply from 69.73.166.75: bytes=32 time=92ms TTL=54
Reply from 69.73.166.75: bytes=32 time=393ms TTL=54
Reply from 69.73.166.75: bytes=32 time=447ms TTL=54
Reply from 69.73.166.75: bytes=32 time=92ms TTL=54
Reply from 69.73.166.75: bytes=32 time=92ms TTL=54
Reply from 69.73.166.75: bytes=32 time=99ms TTL=54

Ping statistics for 69.73.166.75:
    Packets: Sent = 100, Received = 97, Lost = 3 (3% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 91ms, Maximum =  447ms, Average =  97ms

C:\>
    DISCLAIMER Any resemblance between the views expressed above and those of the owners and operators of this system is purely coincidental. Any resemblance between these views and my own are non-deterministic. The existence of Vin DSL is questionable. The existence of views in the absence of anyone to hold them is problematic. The existence of the reader is left as an exercise in the second-order coefficient.

    No Guts, No Story! VinDSL © 2010
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 07-23-2006, 06:56 PM #3
    Spathiphyllum
    Spathiphyllum is offline
    || $name ne 'R.Stiltskin'
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Tejas
    Posts
    2,438
    Heck Vin,

    It's timing out 'cause there's a lot a pingin' goin' on.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules