My partnering company wants to purchase another account with Jaguar but they can't decide on VPS or SDX. SDX obviously has more resources, but it has to have its negatives.
Please help me help them
Thanks,
Ivan
This is a discussion on vps or sdx? in the VPS & Dedicated forum
My partnering company wants to purchase another account with Jaguar but they can't decide on VPS or SDX. SDX obviously has more resources, but it ...
My partnering company wants to purchase another account with Jaguar but they can't decide on VPS or SDX. SDX obviously has more resources, but it has to have its negatives.
Please help me help them
Thanks,
Ivan
DISCLAIMER Any resemblance between the views expressed above and those of the owners and operators of this system is purely coincidental. Any resemblance between these views and my own are non-deterministic. The existence of Vin DSL is questionable. The existence of views in the absence of anyone to hold them is problematic. The existence of the reader is left as an exercise in the second-order coefficient.
How come I don't see control panel options on the features list?
http://www.jaguarpc.com/semi-dedicated/
And the way they promote it, its as if it's performance level is right in between Shared and VPS
Are you saying this plan is pretty much like a regular reseller but with much more capacity resources?
Please see this:
http://www.jaguarpc.com/support/kbase/702.html
Exactly!
Let me give you a couple of practical examples...
First example: My primary site uses a highly modified version of PHP-Nuke. The main page itself requires 200+ queries to the MySQL db. I've had 800+ visitors on this site at one time, and SDX wasn't even breathing hard (no increase in server load)!
Second example: I run a flat file db on my ODP module. At any given time, there is 500K-1M files sitting in the cache folder (average size 9KB). This alone is amazing - but, when I go to prune it (to say the last 30 days) it used to bring regular servers at JagPC to their knees, for like 15 minutes. SDX will prune this cache in a couple of minutes, and once again, it isn't even breathing hard.
So, if you're looking for a brutal powerhouse server, albeit shared, SDX is the way to go!
DISCLAIMER Any resemblance between the views expressed above and those of the owners and operators of this system is purely coincidental. Any resemblance between these views and my own are non-deterministic. The existence of Vin DSL is questionable. The existence of views in the absence of anyone to hold them is problematic. The existence of the reader is left as an exercise in the second-order coefficient.
SDX is a shared server on steriods. Fewer users are on the server, which translates into more resources for the users that are there. It is essentially the same config as a standard shared server: you get a single cPanel account just like you'd get when you sign up for a GigaDeal, but you get access to all of the resources and memory available on that server at any given tim. If you need power, go SDX.
A VPS server probably has as many users as a SDX machine, but each user is sitting in a separate "sandbox." The server is partitioned into pieces, each piece gets a chuck of guaranteed memory (plus some burstable RAM), but resource allocation isn't as liberal. On the other hand, everyone gets root and the ability to custom tailor the environment to his own needs. If you need control, go VPS.
SDX is not a step up from VPS nor is VPS a step up from SDX. They are both different offerings for different needs.
Here's another way to look at it:
--JasonCode:SDX VPS ==================== === === Accounts 20 20 Apache Installs 1 20 MySQL Installs 1 20 Mail Server Installs 1 20
Last edited by jason; 12-19-2007 at 04:45 PM.
Sorry, my friend, but you don't get it either, evidently!
I'm resting my feet on a 'standard server' right now, as I type...
Sure, it isn't a 'standard shared JagPC server'... it's a ^%$& POS Slackware box - haven't rebooted it in years.
Personally, I could run ALL my sites out of the house on this server with no problem, but I don't have a connection to the backbone of the web like JagPC does.
Moreover, I probably got $500 in this personal web server - JaguarPC probably has $5000 in Kraken!
Truly, I don't know how they make ANY money on SDX servers @ $29.97/mo. but that's their business. Maybe it's a loss-leader or something, like selling Pepsi for $1.99 a case at Christmas time - hoping you'll be so happy that you'll buy a managed dedicated server.
Whatever the case may be, if you want power, SDX is the deal of deal-of-the-century!
VPS is for (virtual) control freaks, IMHO! Like...
Look at me! I control 256MB of RAM ($7.99 at Best Buys).![]()
Last edited by Vin DSL; 12-20-2007 at 01:04 AM.
DISCLAIMER Any resemblance between the views expressed above and those of the owners and operators of this system is purely coincidental. Any resemblance between these views and my own are non-deterministic. The existence of Vin DSL is questionable. The existence of views in the absence of anyone to hold them is problematic. The existence of the reader is left as an exercise in the second-order coefficient.
The specs on an SDX and a shared server are essentially the same. They are both monster machines with cPanel. The SDX just has fewer accounts and therefore a higher resource to account ratio. What's not to get?
--Jason
Copyright © 2011 JaguarPC.com
Bookmarks