I love using it, but once I get over 1,000 messages on any account. It takes a minute to load up on any email client or just via the ol' web mail.
Any work around ideas?
This is a discussion on Imap in the VPS & Dedicated forum
I love using it, but once I get over 1,000 messages on any account. It takes a minute to load up on any email client ...
I love using it, but once I get over 1,000 messages on any account. It takes a minute to load up on any email client or just via the ol' web mail.
Any work around ideas?
Hmmm I'm not having that problem... I did before with Google Apps and IMAP but one day it just decided to start working correctly...
Which email client are you using? Last time I tried Thunderbird it took so much longer to load the messages with IMAP than Outlook did...
-Daniel
If the automobile had followed the same development cycle as the computer, a Rolls-Royce today would cost $100, get a million miles to the gallon, and explode once every few weeks.
My scripts never have bugs. They just develop random features.
DISCLAIMER Any resemblance between the views expressed above and those of the owners and operators of this system is purely coincidental. Any resemblance between these views and my own are non-deterministic. The existence of Vin DSL is questionable. The existence of views in the absence of anyone to hold them is problematic. The existence of the reader is left as an exercise in the second-order coefficient.
It's actually quite opposite for me. Specifically if the user has a big attachment (+3mb), their Outlook lags out.
I know the PC has to have processing power but Thunderbird seems to cache all the headers quicker than Outlook.
~Cool
In 3 days, you've gone from asking for help, to being an expert!
You're on your own, baby!![]()
DISCLAIMER Any resemblance between the views expressed above and those of the owners and operators of this system is purely coincidental. Any resemblance between these views and my own are non-deterministic. The existence of Vin DSL is questionable. The existence of views in the absence of anyone to hold them is problematic. The existence of the reader is left as an exercise in the second-order coefficient.
Copyright © 2011 JaguarPC.com
Bookmarks