can someone tell my why Spam Assassin thinks this message is spam?

[tnttech]

As you can see, I did change the real email addresses and real names, so they would not be visible to the public. Both email addresses are vaild addresses.

Any thoughts as to why JaguarPC & Spam Assassin think this message is spam?

I am guessing that because the sender of the message was using html in their copy of Outlook Express...that caused the spam trigger?

Thanks for your help,
Troy

From: "name removed to protect the innocent" <email@charter.net>
Date: September 9, 2010 2:59:41 PM CDT
To: <email@peaceantigo.org>
Subject: got your phone message...
Return-Path: <email@charter.net>
Envelope-To: email@peaceantigo.org
Delivery-Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2010 15:59:41 -0400
Received: from mta31.charter.net ([216.33.127.82]) by geonosis.nocdirect.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <email@charter.net>) id 1OtnHY-0000dl-Ls for email@peaceantigo.org; Thu, 09 Sep 2010 15:59:40 -0400
Received: from imp09 ([10.20.200.9]) by mta31.charter.net (InterMail vM.7.09.02.04 201-2219-117-106-20090629) with ESMTP id <20100909195936.PHFY4190.mta31.charter.n et@imp09> for <d.kohler@peaceantigo.org>; Thu, 9 Sep 2010 15:59:36 -0400
Received: from D7KCBJ31 ([96.40.246.170]) by imp09 with smtp.charter.net id 4jzb1f00A3hJybC05jzbVt; Thu, 09 Sep 2010 15:59:36 -0400
X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=XBN6XnJjvhIA:10 a=hOpmn2quAAAA:8 a=TuN8YlENXAE0jQTOLYMA:9 a=LcWZ0Jc9I2dqrKYPK0ApuNt1MVgA:4 a=pILNOxqGKmIA:10 a=e2EWN5CMFWYA:10 a=ObjgKFXWe-4A:10 a=hUswqBWy9Q8A:10 a=38LwziJdhyhI3U51IBQA:9 a=dGKvoNWzvS3Bc2X4CnQA:7 a=tViOw9iJum3hQ2VW6qgwN36M1lIA:4 a=VdXGauVTlG5FnGsh4xsA:9 a=P08VmMxSxbWcpsOP3seuH9PTreoA:4 a=1Vq_FK4TplAA:10 a=8cjj7p-wvfYw1SkCzqQA:9 a=R4LhTN6DCaoNIwdWUxUA:9 a=fXhlznZOyXsxNGcGgVCsuDPpc5gA:4 a=KQqxNPgzF0kA:10 a=UgPg92xnMUx7xZnr:18
Message-Id: <97F0BB6101E44A068494BD16F83E183A@D7KCBJ 31>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/related; type="multipart/alternative"; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0005_01CB502F.A1E7A930"
X-Priority: 3
X-Msmail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
Disposition-Notification-To: "real name was here" <email@charter.net>
X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5931
X-Spam-Subject: ***SPAM*** got your phone message...
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=9.9
X-Spam-Score: 99
X-Spam-Bar: +++++++++
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "geonosis.nocdirect.com", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Nature : This time, the voicemail worked, so, it seems it's finally fixed! Hallelujah! Thanks very much! Peace ~ P [...] Content analysis details: (9.9 points, 7.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 5.0 EXTRA_MPART_TYPE Header has extraneous Content-type:...type= entry -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 1.6 HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24 BODY: HTML: images with 2000-2400 bytes of words 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 5.0 SARE_GIF_ATTACH FULL: Email has a inline gif 0.9 STOCK_IMG_CTYPE Stock spam image part, with distinctive Content-Type header
X-Spam-Flag: YES

[Ron]

It's right there in the SA scoring- 5.0 points for having an inline .gif
Also troubling is a 2.6 points for a Bayesian Probability of 0 to 1 percent. You should open a ticket to support and see why that bayes score is seemingly so weird.

[Ron]

Whoops! I think that is a negative 2.6; in my iPhone formatting, the minus sign is on the previous line. Never mind! :-)